SHAKEEL S/O UMARDEEN @ NAGRIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4037/2026 · 2026-04-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1677 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1677 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4037/2026 Shakeel S/o Umardeen @ Nagriya, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kaban Ka Vas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.140/2021 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143 and 382 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is that he along with other accused has taken the tractor from the complainant forcibly. He submits that in the present matter, the co-accused Rahul has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2026. The case of the petitioner is akin to him. The petitioner has been in custody since 05.02.2026 with criminal antecedents in six cases in which he is
[2026:RJ-JP:14170] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4037/2026] already on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Shakeel S/o Umardeen @ Nagriya, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/78