MANOS JYOTI MAZUMDAR v. SMT. BANDANA DAS and 2 ORS.
CRP/231/2016 · 2026-03-26
Kaushik Goswami
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1677 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1677 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010115032016
2026:GAU-AS:4435
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/231/2016 MANOS JYOTI MAZUMDAR S/OLT. BIMAL MAZUMDAR R/O C/O "ELECTRA", M.C. ROAD, TEZPUR, P.O.
TEZPUR MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS SMT. BANDANA DAS and 2 ORS.
D/O LT. SOMEN DAS 2:SRI RONAL DAS S/O LT. SOMEN DAS 3:SMTI. MINU DAS W/O LT. GOURISH CHANDRA DAS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF M.C. ROAD TEZPUR P.O. TEZPUR MOUZA- MAHABHAIRAB DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SUNDI, Advocate for the Respondent : MR H J TAMULI (R1-R3), MR. B CHAKRABORTY,MR D KALITA,MR H J TAMULI
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER 27.03.2026 None appeared for the petitioner on call. Heard Mr. H J Tamuli, learned counsel for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion, i.e., 26.03.2026 as well, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call. Accordingly, the matter was
directed to be listed today with the remark ‘for dismissal’ in the cause list. The matter having been listed today with the remark ‘for dismissal’, indicating the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. P Sundi, there is still no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the petitioner, the instant petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, accordingly stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant