Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16769 (JHR)

YOGENDRA KUMAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WPC/4049/2026 · 2026-06-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17547 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4049 of 2026 -- Yogendra Kumar, aged about 44 years, Son of Sri. Budhan Saw, Resident of- Nutan Nagar, Oreya, P.O.-Oreya, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand ...Petitioner VERSUS 1. The Union of India 2. The Director General, Railway Protection Force, Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road, P.O. & P.S.- Raisina Road, District-Central Delhi, New Delhi 3. The Inspector General-cum- PCSC/RPF, having its office at-Garden Reach, P.O. & P.S.-Garden Reach, District- Kolkata, West Bengal. 4. The Deputy Inspector General, RPF, having its office at- Garden Reach, P.O. & P.S.- Garden Reach, District- Kolkata, West Bengal. 5. The Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF Ranchi Division, having its office at- Hatia, P.O.- Hatia, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Navin Kumar, Ranjit Kumar, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI Mr. Ayush, A.C to ASGI -- 03/17.06.2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing the Force Order No. 35/2026 dated 09.06.2026 (Annexure-3) issued by the 3rd Respondent, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Ranchi to Chakradharpur. 2. On the last date, Mr. Prashant Pallav, learned ASGI sought adjournment to seek instruction on the pending representation of the petitioner and today he places an order dated 11.06.2026 issued from the office of Divisional Security Commissioner, Hatia, Ranchi, which indicates that the concerned staff may be directed to appear 2026:JHHC:17547 2 before the In-charge, ASC, in the OR on 12.06.2026 at 10:00 Hrs. The same letter is taken on record. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on that date the petitioner was seriously ill and he was admitted in the Railway Hospital itself. 3. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application stands disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 2 as indicated in letter dated 11.06.2026 raising his grievance as early as possible, but not beyond the period of 7 days from today. If the petitioner approaches the respondent no. 2 within the aforesaid stipulated period; his case may be considered in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 17th June, 2026 Jk Uploaded on 17/06/2026