MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTEHR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/3957/2026 · 2026-04-07
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE 154
Manpreet Kaur an State of Punjab
CORAM : HON
Present :- Ms. N
VINOD S. BHAR
The have approached seeking direction liberty from the h Lear petitioners are m However, their re as a result thereof representation dat at the hands of petitioners to the Barnala. The there is a constant Notic Pursu N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-395 Date of dec
and another
VERSUS and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Ms. Nikita Garg, Advocate for the pe
*****
BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Manpreet K ached this Court under Article 226 of t ections to official respondents to pro the hands of private respondent No.4
Learned counsel for the petitioners are major and are staying togethe heir relationship is not acceptable to t thereof, the private respondents are th ion dated 05.04.2026 (Annexure P-2 ds of the private respondents already to the respondent No.2- Senior Superi The petitioners apprehend threat to nstant danger of them being implicate Notice of motion restricted to respon Pursuant to supply of advance cop
NJAB & HARYANA ARH 3957-2026(O&M) of decision: 07.04.2026
...Petitioners
...Respondents INOD S. BHARDWAJ the petitioners. reet Kaur and Charanjeet Singh 26 of the Constitution of India for protect their life and personal t No.4. oners inter alia contends that the together in live-in relationship. le to the private respondents and are threatening the petitioners. A 2) against the threat extended already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, District eat to their lives and claim that plicated in a false case. respondents No.1 to 3 only. e copy, Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal,
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.08 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 154 CRWP-3957-2026(O&M)
AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. She has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Barnala, District Barnala to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 05.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Sadar Barnala, District Barnala for requisite compliance.
07.04.2026
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.04.08 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document