1 2026:CGHC:5302 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5982 of 2019 1 - Ranjit Kumar Singh S/o Late Shri Lal Bahadur Singh Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As A Plant Operator, C.B.D.A. Bio Diesel Plant, R/o Road No. 8, Quarter No. 10 (D) Sector-1, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Himanshu Tiwari S/o Shri Prakash Chand Tiwari Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As A Junior Assistant, C.B.D.A. Bio Diesel Plant, R/o Ews- 20, Housing Board Colony, Kachna, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Energy Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 2 - Director Chhattisgarh Biofuel Development Agency Biodiesel Plant Complex, V.I.P. Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 3 - Project Officer Chhattisgarh Biofuel Development Agency, Biodiesel Plant Complex, V.I.P. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 4 - Managing Director C.S.P.D.C.L., Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Shahil Singh, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Miss Anamika Jain appears on behalf of Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate. KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.01.31 17:14:57 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal , J Order On Board 30/01/2026 1. The petitioners are challenging the order dated 26.7.2019 (Annexure-P/1) by which they have been attached to the office of CSPDCL. 2. This Court by an interim order dated 13.8.2019 had stayed the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 26.7.2019 (Annexure-P/1) in respect of the petitioners, as a result of which the petitioners are working in the original place of posting. 3. Considering the fact that the petitioners have already worked in the original place of posting for a period of 6 years on the strength of interim order, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned order dated 26.7.2019 (Annexure-P/1) deserves to be and is hereby set aside. However, the respondents would be at liberty to pass fresh order, in accordance with law, in case exigency so arises. 4. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Barve