DHIRENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI SHEESH RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2191/2026 · 2026-02-05
Chandra Prakash Shrimali
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16758 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16758 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5329] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2191/2026 Dhirendra Singh S/o Shri Sheesh Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill. Shyosingh Ka Pura, Peelwa, Police Station Nayi Mandi, Hindoun City, District Kauroli (Raj.) (At Present Accused Is Confined In The Jail) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartar Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order 05/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.166/2025 registered at Police Station Manak Chowk, District Jaipur City (North) for the offences under Sections 305(e) and 331(4) of B.N.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the co-accused persons namely Sandeep Singh S/o Pratap Singh and Anil Kumar Choursiya S/o Shri Basantlal have already been granted bail by this Court in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application Nos.15023/2025 and 16413/2025 vide
order dated 20.01.2026 He also further submits that no recovery
[2026:RJ-JP:5329] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2191/2026] has been made from the petitioner. He also submits the accused- petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dhirendra Singh S/o Shri Sheesh Ram be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the Court concerned on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GARIMA /211