Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010191262026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3174/2026 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 87 M. G. ROAD FORT MUMBAI-400001 AND ONE OF ITS NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT LACHIT NAGAR G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-781007 VERSUS DIL BAHADUR CHETRY AND 2 ORS. S/O LT. PREM BAHADUR CHETRY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NEPALIBASTI P.O. NEPALIBASTI P.S. MISSAMARI DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784506. 2:SARBAN ROY S/O RAJDEO RAY R/O VILLAGE BARIKA CHUBURI P.S. TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784154. 3:GHANASHYAM ADHIKARI S/O MAN BAHADUR ADHIKARI R/O VILLAGE NAPAM P.O. NAPAM Page No.# 2/4 P.S. TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784028 ------------ Advocate for : A BIYANI Advocate for : appearing for DIL BAHADUR CHETRY AND 2 ORS. In MACApp./489/2026 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 87, M. G. ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI 400001 AND ONE OF ITS NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT LACHIT NAGAR, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI 781007. VERSUS DIL BAHADUR CHETRY AND 2 ORS. S/O LT. PREM BAHADUR CHETRY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NEPALLIBASTI, P.O. NEPALIBASTI, P.S. MISSAMARI, DISTRICT SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN 784506. 2:SARBAN ROY S/O RAJDEO RAY R/O VILLAGE BARIKA CHUBURI P.S. TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784154. 3:GHANSHYAM ADHIKARI S/O MAN BAHADUR ADHIKARI R/O VILLAGE NAPAM P.O. NAPAM P.S. TEZPUR DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784028 Advocate for the Petitioner : A BIYANI, MS P HUJURI,MR. R K BHATRA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S R GOGOI(R1), MR. C SARMAH(R1) Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 14.10.2026 1. Heard Mr.R.K. Bhatra,the learned counselfor theapplicant. Also heard Mr. S.R. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1/claimant. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/ insurance company in connection with MAC Appeal No. 489/2026, praying for stay of execution of the judgment and award dated 20.06.2026, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonitpur, Tezpur in MAC Case No. 49/2022. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though there was no permanent disability of the claimant as a result of the accident involved in the case, however, while calculating the loss of income, the Tribunal has applied the multiplier formula and multiplied the yearly income of the injured with the multiplier 15, which, according to the learned counsel for the applicant, is a wrong calculation. He submits that said aspect has been assailed by the insurance company in the connected appeal. He, however, submits that considering the aforesaid circumstances, the applicant/insurance company is still ready to deposit 25 % of the awarded amount as a condition for grant of stay of execution of the impugned judgment and award. 4. The learned counsel for the claimant/opposite parties has not raised any objection. 5. Hence the prayer is allowed,withoutissuing notice to the other opposite parties. 6. The judgment and award dated 20.06.2026, passed in MAC Case No. 49/2022 shall not be executed during the pendency of the connected MAC Page No.# 4/4 Appeal, subject to deposit of 25% of the awarded amount by the applicant/Insurance Company before the Registry of this Court within a period of 4(four) weeks from the date of this order. 7. On such deposit being made, same shall be disbursed to the claimant/opposite party No. 1 after proper verification, on furnishing an indemnity bond equivalent to the amount so disburse. 8. With the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant