[2026:RJ-JP:5455] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 197/2026 1. Babu Lal Meena S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Jhajhi Rampura, Post Office Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan-303327 2. Anjali Kumari Meena D/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Kachawa, Alwar, Rajasthan-301413 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar. 4. S.H.O. Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar-321607 5. Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Tunda Ram Meena, Resident Of Kachawa, Alwar, Rajasthan-301413 6. Kali Devi W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Meena, Resident Of Kachawa, Alwar, Rajasthan-301413 7. Mohit Kumar Meena S/o Mukesh Kumar Meena, Resident Of Kachawa, Alwar, Rajasthan-301413 8. Puran Sarpanch S/o Shri Sharwan Lal Meena, Resident Of Kachawa, Alwar, Rajasthan-301413 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Gangwar Mr. Anurag Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 05/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as they [2026:RJ-JP:5455] (2 of 3) [CRLW-197/2026] are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 23.01.2026 at Arya Samaj Jhotwara, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Dy. Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:5455] (3 of 3) [CRLW-197/2026] 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Ritu/224