Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16740 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2580/2026 · 2026-02-13

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2580/2026 1. Mahendra Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Bhandari, Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Sitaram Sharma Son Of Govindsahay Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Bhandari, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government O Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector And Chairman PLPC, Dausa. 4. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. 5. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vivek Joshi, Adv. Ms. Sneha Gulati, Adv. Ms. Nikita Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shruti Chandgothia, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/02/2026 1. Learned counsel by way of this PIL has alleged that there has been encroachment on pastureland. 2. We find that in this regard complaint has to be filed before the concerned Tehsildar. (2 of 2) [CW-2580/2026] 2. We direct Tehsildar to conduct the inspection and pass the necessary orders and, if there is any encroachment, the same shall be removed after giving opportunity of hearing to respective parties. 3. Accordingly, granting liberty to approach the Tehsildar of the concerned area, Tehsil Sikrai, Distt. Dausa, the writ petition is disposed of. 4. The petitioner would be free to approach this Court, if no action is taken on by the authorities. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Shivani/Ekta/25