Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16738 (PNJ)

CHANDER PAL v. RANJEET AND OTHERS

CR/3233/2026 · 2026-05-12

Deepak Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-3233-2026 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3233-2026 Date of decision: 12.05.2026 Chander Pal ...Peoner Versus Ranjeet and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Peoner herein is the plainff in Civil Suit bearing CS No.665- 2021 tled ‘Chander Pal vs. Ranjeet and others’, which is pending before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mohindergarh. He is aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby his applicaon seeking permission to lead addional evidence has been declined. 2. As the perusal of the record would reveal that the suit was filed by the plainff seeking a decree of permanent injuncon. The case had reached at the stage of rebu<al/arguments when the applicaon (Annexure P-2) was moved. By way of this applicaon, the peoner wanted to tender jamabandis; copy of farad badar, copy of mutaon regarding paron besides copy of registered sale deed dated 14.02.2012 along with annexed site plan, affidavit of one Janta Devi and photographs of the disputed site along with bill. The trial Court aAer nocing that the applicaon had been moved at the last stage of the case when the ma<er was fixed for rebu<al/arguments, dismissed the applicaon. 3. Learned counsel for the peoner submits that peoner will not press for producing the affidavit of Janta Devi or the photographs. However, he be permi<ed to place on record the revenue documents i.e. YOGESH MEHTA 2026.05.12 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-3233-2026 [2] jamabandis, farad badar and mutaon, besides the registered sale deed dated 14.02.2012 because it was specifically referred to in the head note of the plaint itself on which basis, the plainff was claiming tle. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel, the present revision peon is hereby disposed of with the direcon to the concerned trial Court to permit the peoner to tender the aforesaid revenue documents and the sale deed. The effect thereof shall be considered by the trial Court at the me of final adjudicaon. This is subject to ₹20,000/- as costs payable by the peoner to the respondents – defendants through a bank draA on the next date of hearing before the trial Court. 5. Since this peon is being disposed of without issuing any noce to the respondents, they will be at liberty to approach this Court, in case, they feel aggrieved. 12.05.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.05.12 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document