38ba1762-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1762 OF 2026 Kamalsing Sahebsing Singal VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Ghate Sagar Somnath, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. A. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 5th October, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. After hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State, I have perused the entire charge-sheet annexed to the present application with their able assistance. The entire case of the present applicant is based on circumstantial evidence. However, the circumstantial evidence is in the form of statements of witnesses, which also refer to an extra-judicial confession, the prior attempt on the part of the present applicant to commit the murder of the deceased, and the recovery effected from the present applicant. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, I have shown my disinclination to to allow the application. 2. The learned Advocate for the applicant fairly submits that the entire case is based on circumstantial evidence and if the trial does not progress effectively before February, 2027, he may be granted liberty to file a fresh application. He has instruction with the present 1 of 2 38ba1762-26 application. 3. Leave as prayed is granted. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application after February, 2027 in case the trial does not proceed effectively. 4. If the applicant prefers the fresh bail application before the trial court, then the trial court shall consider the same on its own merits, in accordance with law. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2