Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16734 (JHR)

SUBHAMOY BANERJEE @ SUBHOMAY BANERJEE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5296/2026 · 2026-06-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5296 of 2026 1. Subhamoy Banerjee @ Subhomay Banerjee, aged about 51 years 2. Tanmay Baneerjee aged about 62 years Both sons of Late Dilip Kumar Banerjee, resident of 166A Roy Bahadur Road Behala, P.O. & P.S. Behala, District – Kolkata 700034 (West Bengal) …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s) -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, APP ------ 2/15.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.74 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with co-accused persons, have cheated the informant and have taken Rs.25,00,000/-, but supplied cement worth only for Rs.2,51,000/- only. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the occurrence took place in connection with the commercial transaction between the parties and the petitioners had no intention to cheat the informant from the very inception. It is next submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 19.03.2026 as mentioned in Para-19 of the petition. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagar Untari, Garhwa, in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.74 of 2024, with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 15.06.2026 R.Kumar Uploaded on 17.06.2026