Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16734 (BOM)

SAYED ABDUL NAIM SAYED ABDUL RAHIM v. DAMODHAR VEDUBA AHER AND ORS

CA/8379/2012 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 46.CA-8379-2012.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8379 OF 2012 IN FAST/16073/2012 SAYED ABDUL NAIM SAYED ABDUL RAHIM VERSUS DAMODHAR VEDUBA AHER AND ORS … Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Tushar Shinde h/f Mr. C.K. Shinde … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 7th OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8379/2012 : 1. The application is filed for condonation of a delay of 83 days in filing the First Appeal. Though the Respondents served, have not filed any reply to the application. 2. From the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the Appellant did not initially file the appeal as settlement talks were underway between the parties. The said averment has not been controverted by filing an affidavit-in-reply. In view of this, the application for condonation of delay is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the High Court Library. 3. The application is disposed of. ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.16073/2012 : 4. Issue notice to the Respondents for final disposal of the 2026:BHC-AUG:47204 2 46.CA-8379-2012.doc appeal at the admission stage, returnable on 20.11.2026. 5. The Appellant is directed to serve Respondents by private mode through Speed Post, in addition to regular mode of service and file affidavit of service before the returnable date. 6. Call Record and Proceedings. ROHIT W. JOSHI JUDGE ₙₐⱼₑₑᵦ...