Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16733 (JHR)

SOURAV SINGH ALIAS TODE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5303/2026 · 2026-06-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:17368 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5303 of 2026 ------ Sourav Singh @ Tode, aged about 24 years, son of Rajendra Singh, resident of Golpahari, Near Kundu Puwal Tal, P.O. & P.S.-Parsudih, District-East Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 61(2), 310(4), 310(5), 111(2)(b), 111(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B) (a), 25(6), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was planning to commit dacoity. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been arrayed as an accused on the basis of the statement made by the co-accused persons. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.04.2026 as is evident from para-16 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16/06/2026 Abhiraj/