GANESH DNYANESHWAR KUTE v. VASANTRAO NAIK MARATHWADA KRUSHI UNIVERSITY, PARBHANI, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR
WP/7281/2020 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16733 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16733 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} wp7281-20.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7281 OF 2020 Ganesh Dnyaneshwar Kute
PETITIONER VERSUS Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krushi University Parbhani and Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2 .......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 30
th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
1. None for the Petitioner when the matter is called out.
2. We have perused the decision rendered by this Court in Review Application No. 98 of 2022. Relevant observations of this Court are as follows:
“16. To ascertain the facts, the registers issuing NCL certificates were directed to be produced. After examining the registers, it was found that there are no entries issuing certificates on which the Applicant relies. The next question is, how the certificate was issued on 01.05.2014, a State holiday declared as Maharashtra Day / Kamgar Din (Labour Day). Considering the facts revealed to the Petitioner after the order under review was passed, the Court is of 2026:BHC-AUG:46338-DB
{2} wp7281-20.doc the view that the new facts discovered had relevance to the issue and required to be considered afresh, and opportunity needs to be granted to put forth the facts of the case and decide the right of Respondent No.1 on merit. Hence, we deem it appropriate and just to recall our Order dated 13.10.2021. As a consequence, Writ Petition No. 7281 of 2020 is restored to it’s stage at which it was decided vide our Order dated 13.10.2021.”
3. On perusal of the record, it is clear that NCL certificate was never issued to the Petitioner and may be, after the order passed by this Court, the said certificate was issued and after examining the registers, no entries were found issuing the certificate on which the Petitioner has placed reliance.
4. In this view of the matter, we find no merit in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of non prosecution as well as merit.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp7281-20.doc