Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16732 (KAR)

SRI B N ANANT v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30289/2025 · 2026-02-06

M Nagaprasanna, R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 30289 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B.N.ANANT S/O SRI B.VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT H.NO. 125, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS, BALAJI LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE NORTH BENGALURU – 560 097. 2. SMT. ASHA RANI W/O RAVI ROY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT 010 VIVEN TRAILS KATTIGENHALLI, SRINIVASAPUR YELAHANKA, BENGALURU – 560 064. 3. SRI KRANTI PRASAD MANDAL AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE SRI K.L.MANDAL R/AT L-201,BML PALMS APARTMENT JAMIA MASJID ROAD, MS PALYA VIDYARANYAPURA POST – 560 097. Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 4. SRI P.SANTHOSH KUMAR S/O SRI P.V.RAMANAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.1261 KALIAMMA TEMPLE ROAD KALASHRINGARA, T.DASARAHALLI BENGALURU NORTH – 560 057. 5. SHABBIR AHAMMAD M., S/O M.ABDUL RAHIMAN AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS FLAT NO.3, HOUSE NO.20/2 AMB ONYX, 2ND CROSS ASHWATH NAGAR, RMV 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 560 094. 6. SMT. SUMAN SAINI W/O LAXMIKANT SAINI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.B309, SANKALP CHERRY BLOSSOM, IDGAH ROAD VARTHUR, BENGALURU – 560 087. 7. SRI A.S.PRAVEEN S/O K.ANNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT 2ND CROSS BEHIND DENTAL COLLEGE VIDYANAGAR, HASSAN – 573 201. 8. SRI N.VENKATARAMANA REDDY S/O N.RAMACHANDRA REDDY RESIDING AT BYSANIVANI PALLI THETTU, CHITTOR, KURABALAKOTA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 ANDHRA PRADESH – 517 352. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SANDEEP LAHIRI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN LAND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU – 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD BENGALURU – 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.RAJAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI SHIVAPRASAD M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 23/07/2025 AND THEREBY DIRECT THE BDA TO REALLOT THE SAME SITES HELD BY THE PETITIONERS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 IN THE MEHI ENCLAVE LAYOUT, NOW FALLING WITHIN THE SHIVARAM KARANTH LAYOUT, IN RECOGNITION OF THEIR VOLUNTARY SURRENDER AND LONG-STANDING POSSESSION (ANNEXURE-A) THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) Heard Sri Sandeep Lahiri, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri M. Rajakumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and Sri Shivaprasad M. Shantanagoudar, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Sri Sandeep Lahiri, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have converted the subject land from agriculture to residential purpose on 18.11.2008, prior to the issuance of the preliminary notification dated 30.12.2008 and the final notification. The petitioners submitted representation for re-allotment of the sites Dr. Shivaram - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 Karanth Layout. The representation not having met its consideration, has preferred this petition before this Court. 3. Sri Shivaprasad Shantanagoudar, learned counsel for the respondents – BDA submits that if reasonable time is granted, the representation of the petitioners would be considered and necessary orders would be passed in accordance with law. 4. In the light of the aforesaid submission, we deem it appropriate to pass the following: ORDER a. The writ petition is allowed. b. The respondents – Bangalore Development Authority to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners on 23.07.2025, within a period of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. c. The respondents – Bangalore Development Authority shall also communicate the order that would be passed on the representation, to the petitioners. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7297-DB WP No. 30289 of 2025 d. Till the consideration of the representation happens, the parties are directed to maintain status quo, qua the properties of the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58 CT:SS