Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16732 (BOM)

RAJYOGI SADGURU SHREE SHIVKUMAR SHIVACHARAYA MAHAWAMIJI ALIAS RAJYOGI SADGURU SHRI SHRI SHRI v. GANESH KRISHNARAO PANSARE AND OTHERS

CA/1891/2026 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1-CA.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2026 IN WP/2527/2002 Rajyogi Sadguru Shree Shivkumar Shivacharaya Mahawamiji Alias Rajyogi Sadguru Shri Shri Shri Versus Ganesh Krishnarao Pansare And Others … Advocate for Applicant : Party in Person AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Joshi Advocate for Petitioner in WP : Mr. R.C. Brahmankar Advocate for Respondent Nos.42 & 43 : Mr. P.S. Koshti Advocate for Respondent No.3 in WP/281/2026 & 289/2026 : Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad h/f Mr. Niteen V. Gaware Advocate for Respondent No.23 : Mr. Shubham S. Kote h/f Mr. A.V. Hon ... CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 07, 2026 P.C.: 1. Present application is filed seeking permission to intervene in present petition. The subject matter of present petition are agricultural lands which according to petitioners are their personal properties. The dispute pertains to an entry in revenue record that the properties are inam lands. The petitioners are prosecuting their cause for deletion of entry of suit properties being inam lands. 2. The applicant has filed present application for intervention claiming to be Dharmguru. According to him, it is his right and also duty to protect the properties donated to the idols and places of religious worship of Hindu religion. 2026:BHC-AUG:47069 2 1-CA.odt 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the claim of the applicant being a Dharmguru will not clothe him with locus to oppose the prayers by intervening in present petition. 4. In view of aforesaid, application for intervention is rejected. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Mujaheed//