Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16728 (JHR)

JAGDISH RAJAK v. ANJU RAJAK

FA/184/2024 · 2026-06-15

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17170-DB p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 184 of 2024 ------ Jagdish Rajak, son of Mahadeo Rajak, aged about 55 years, present and permanent resident of Shivaji Path, Govind Nagar, Uliyan More, Divya Sai Apartment, Flat No. C/2 P.O. and P.S. Kadma, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum … Appellant Versus Anju Rajak, wife of Jagdish Rajak, daughter of late Sitaram Sethy resident of Shivaji Path, Govind Nagar, Uliyan More, Divya Sai Apartment, Flat No. C/2 P.O. and P.S. Kadma, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, and presently residing at C/o Rajesh Sethy, Basant Colony, E-24 Phase-II, P.O. and P.S. Rourkela, District- Sundergarh (Odisha) PIN 769012. … Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate ------ 05/Dated: 15th June, 2026 I.A. No. 7518 of 2026: 1. The learned counsel, by pressing the instant interlocutory application, has submitted that the appellant is not willing to press this appeal. 2. As such, prayer has been made for the withdrawal of the appeal. 3. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the interlocutory application being I.A. No. 7518 of 2026 stands allowed, and as such, disposed of. 2026:JHHC:17170-DB p. 2 First Appeal No. 184 of 2024: 5. In consequence of the interlocutory application as referred hereinabove, the instant appeal being First Appeal No. 184 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn, and as such disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 15th June, 2026 Samarth