Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010066422025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 407, 408 & 409/2025 Between:
1. E.DILIP KUMAR, S/O. RAJA GOPAL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER IN APSRTC, PRESENTLY WORKING AT PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. DWARAKA TIRUMAL RAO, THE MD RTC HOUSE, PNBS VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. K SUDHAKARAIAH, . THE DEPO MANAGER, PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and to punish the respondent for willful violation and disobedience of Honble Court orders passed in W.P.No.20532 of 2024 dated 24.12.2024 under Section 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the presence of respondent No.1 on 12.12.2025 as directed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 21.11.2025, from the instant case, in the interest of justice. Page 2 of 5
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 408/2025 Between:
1. P.NAGA MALLESHWAR, S/O. P.V.KRISHNA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. CONDUCTOR IN APSRTC, PRESENTLY WORKING AT PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. DWARAKA TIRUMAL RAO, THE MD RTC HOUSE, PNBS VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.
K SUDHAKARAIAH, THE DEPO MANAGER, PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon and to punish the respondent for willful violation and disobedience of Honble Court orders passed in W.P.No.20531 of 2024 dated24.12.2024 under Section 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the presence of respondent No.1 on 12.12.2025 as directed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 21.11.2025, from the instant case, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA p. 3 Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 409/2025 Between:
1. S KAREEMULLLA, S/O. S.MODHIN AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER IN APSRTC, PRESENTLY WORKING AT PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. DWARAKA TIRUMAL RAO, THE MD RTC HOUSE, PNBS VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.
K SUDHAKARAIAH, THE DEPO MANAGER, PUNGANUR RTC DEPO, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and to punish the respondent for willful violation and disobedience of Hon'ble Court orders passed in W.P.No.20524 of 2024 dated.24.12.2024 under Section 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the presence of respondent No.1 on 12.12.2025 as directed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 21.11.2025, from the instant case, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) p. 4 The Court made the following:
:: COMMON ORDER ::
The above contempt cases are filed complaining of a violation of the common order dated 24.12.2024 passed in W.P.No.20524, 20531 & 20532 of
2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the common order dated 24.12.2024 passed in W.P.No.20524, 20531 & 20532 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submissions, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.01.2026 TVN p. 5 68 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE Nos.407, 408 & 409 OF 2025
Date: 02.01.2026 TVN