Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16717 (DEL)

ASHA RANI & ORS. v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/12395/2026 · 2026-08-25

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 12395/2026 $~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010399322026 + W.P.(C) 12395/2026 with CM APPL. 57493/2026, CM APPL. 57494/2026, CM APPL. 57495/2026 and CM APPL. 57496/2026 ASHA RANI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naman Jain, Advocate (through VC) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Pawan Mittal and Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC for R-4, 5 & 9. Mr. Rishabh Raj Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Om Swarup Kumar, Advocate for R-8/BSES RPL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 25.08.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-MCD to take action pursuant to the order passed by the Court on 27th July, 2026 in W.P.(C) 10239/2026 filed by the petitioners to carry forward the proceedings initiated vide show-cause notice dated 14th July, 2026. 2. The earlier writ petition being W.P.(C) 10239/2026 was disposed of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2026 at 11:05:07 W.P.(C) 12395/2026 vide order dated 27th July, 2026 taking note of the fact that a show-cause notice has been issued by respondent-MCD and directing MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-MCD on advance notice submits that a demolition order has been passed on 4th August, 2026 in terms of which 15 days’ time has been given to the respondents no.10 to 12 to remove unauthorized construction. 3.1. Copy of the demolition order has been handed over in Court and the same is taken on record. 4. It has been put to the counsel for the petitioners that the present writ petition is premature. 5. Accordingly, counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition. 6. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Pending applications stand disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J AUGUST 25, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2026 at 11:05:07