Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16714 (BOM)

PRASHANT LAXMAN SAHASHTRABUDHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHER

WP/2952/2024 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2952 OF 2024 Prashant Laxman Sahashtrabudhe Versus The State of Maharashtra Through The Secretary and Others …… Shri. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri. V. M. Kagne, AGP for the Respondent – State. Shri. Anil S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 ….. CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 01st OCTOBER, 2026 P. C. :- . Matter is not on board. Upon mentioning, the same is taken on board. 2. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that, after issuance of notice in the present writ petition, the Acquiring Body has deposited the amount and the Collector has issued notice for payment of compensation to the Petitioner. In that view of the matter, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the quantum of compensation. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 2026:BHC-AUG:46793-DB *2* 4. If any question of delay arises, then time spent by the Petitioner in prosecuting the present Petition shall be taken into consideration while condoning the delay. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) GGP