[2026:RJ-JP:5818] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2402/2026 1. Dulichand S/o Girdhari, Aged About 60 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village Hingota, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 2. Chiranjilal S/o Girdhari, Aged About 70 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village Hingota, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 3. Bhavan S/o Ramfool, Aged About 75 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village Hingota, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 4. Prakash S/o Mangal, Aged About 50 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village Hingota, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan) 5. Somani S/o Narayan, Aged About 55 Years, Permanent Resident Of Village Hingota, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. The Tehsildar, Revenue Accountant, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. The Patwari, Tehsil Baijupada, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Balwada with Mr. Aditya Raj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 09/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, has confined his submissions to the extent of issuance of directions to respondent No.2 to decide their representation dated 20.01.2026, [2026:RJ-JP:5818] (2 of 2) [CW-2402/2026] which was submitted by the petitioners in response to the notices issued to them on 08.12.2025, 18.12.2025 and 13.01.2026. Learned counsel further submits that the said notices direct removal of the electric motor, pipes etc., installed in the tubewell, without granting any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, therefore, the said representation be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously. 2. Taking note of the limited submissions so made, it is directed that respondent No.2 shall decide the representation dated 20.01.2026, submitted by the petitioners within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking and reasoned order, after giving them an opportunity of hearing. However, it is directed that no further action be taken by respondent No.2 until a decision is taken on the representation of the petitioners. 3. Needless to say that this order has been passed only in the context of deciding the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as directing the representation to be decided in a particular manner. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT-RINCHU /03