Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16709 (JHR)

VEENA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/266/2026 · 2026-06-12

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:17136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 266 of 2026 --------- Veena Kumari, aged about 53 years, W/o. late Sita Ram Sahu, R/o. 13E, Bundel Nagar, Sarley, Dipugarha, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, Dist. Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dr. Sadique Razaque, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Vinoba Bhave University Road, Sindoor, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribagh, Dist. Hazaribagh, Jharkhand-825301 3. Shri Sandip Kumar, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, office at Circular Road, P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. …….. ….. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State : Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV For the University : Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Namita Sahay, Advocate For the JPSC : M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---------- 03/ 12.06.2026 Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the order passed by the Writ Court has already been complied. 2. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 12th June, 2026 Kunal/-