[2026:RJ-JP:3130] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2642/2005 1. Hindusthan Petrolium Corporation Limited, having its registered office at 17, Jamshediji Tata Road, Mumbai through its Chairman. 2. Senior Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, having its regional office at Tel Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 3. Mobile Lab, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, having its regional office at Tel Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Appellants/Non-applicants Versus M/s Gupta Auto Agencies, through its proprietor Shri Narendra Gupta S/o Shri Nand Gopal Gupta, R/o J-237, Shiv Sadan, Deepak Marg, Moti Doongari Road, Jaipur. ----Respondent-Applicant For Appellant(s) : Ms.Sukriti Kasliwal (Through VC) with Ms.Tisha Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 23/01/2026 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal to challenge the impugned order dated 10.08.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, on an application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act of 1996’). 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that by the said order, the appellants were directed to take fresh samples and to submit the report before the District Court. The order dated [2026:RJ-JP:3130] (2 of 2) [CMA-2642/2005] 10.08.2005 was stayed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.10.2005, thereafter the respondent did not press his application filed before the District Court. 3. In view thereof, the order dated 10.08.2005 no more survives. It is further informed to this Court that thereafter the arbitration proceedings while initiated, were decided against the respondent. In view thereof, she prayed that the present appeal be disposed of. 4. This Court noticing the fact that the respondent did not press the application filed under Section 9 of the Act of 1996 before the District Court on 25.07.2008 and the same is accordingly stands dismissed in the year 2008 itself, therefore, after conclusion of the arbitration proceedings against the respondent, no order is required to be passed in the present appeal and the same is disposed off accordingly. 5. All pending applications also stand disposed off. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/2