VIKAS SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./2340/2026 · 2026-08-31
Girish Kathpalia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16706 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16706 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 2340/2026
Page 1 of 2 pages $~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 31.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010124632026 + CRL.M.C. 2340/2026
VIKAS SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given)
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/ASI Ghanshyam. Counsel for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 (appearance not given)
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Matter taken up today as the date of 27.08.2026 was declared a holiday vide Notification No. 85/G-4/Genl.I/DHC dated 21.08.2026. 1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 748/2023 of PS Mandwali Fazalpur for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2 herein) has settled all matrimonial disputes with the petitioners. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.31 17:46:27 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:31.08.2026 17:53:28 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 2340/2026
Page 2 of 2 pages
2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/ASI Ghanshyam. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One son was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, and that son is in custody of respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 748/2023 of PS Mandwali Fazalpur for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 31, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.31 17:46:16 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:31.08.2026 17:53:28