SRI GIRIRAJA GOWDA C v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
WP/23801/2024 · 2026-02-27
R Devdas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16703 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16703 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12324 WP No. 23801 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23801 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI GIRIRAJA GOWDA C S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO. 171, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS SIDDAPURA, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE 560 066
2.
SRI VENKATA RAJU C S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/A NO. 171, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS SIDDAPURA, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE 560 066.
3.
SRI CHANDRA SHEKAR C S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A NO. 171, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS SIDDAPURA, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE 560 066. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MURALI N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12324 WP No. 23801 of 2024
34TH FLOOR, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD, BENGALURU 560009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BANGALORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE 560 036.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK K R PURAM, BANGALORE-560036.
4.
THE SURVEY SUPERVISOR BANGALORE EAST (ADDL)TALUK K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560 036.
5.
SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKABACAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
6.
SRI BACHEGOWDA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESPONDENTS 5 & 6 ARE R/O SIDDAPURA VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGLAORE EAST TALUK BANGALORE 560 066 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. G.THA.SA/BHOO.U.NI/THAM(2) P.R.218/2024-25 DTD. 31.07.2024 ISSUED BY THE R-1 PRODUCED AT ANNX-J TO THE WRIT PETITION AS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME.DIRECTION TO THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE UN-NUMBERED APPEAL PRODUCED AT ANNX-H TO THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS ON 16.07.2021 BEFORE THE R-1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12324 WP No. 23801 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 to 4. Notice to other respondents is not necessary for the following reasons:
Learned Counsel for petitioners submits that the appeal preferred by the petitioners before the first respondent-Deputy Director of Land Records has been rejected by the said authority by issuing the impugned endorsement dated 31.07.2024 at Annexure-J, stating that the RTC to the land in question does not reflect the name of the petitioners. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the RTC reflects the name of the petitioners’ father and such an endorsement could not have been issued by the Deputy Commissioner.
2. This Court has perused Annexure-A, RTC, which reflects the name of the petitioners’ father, Late Sri.Chikkamunishamappa S/o Hanumanthappa, to an
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12324 WP No. 23801 of 2024
extent of 1 Acre 38 Guntas in Survey No.61/2 of Siddapura Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk.
3. For the reason stated above, the writ petition is allowed while setting aside the impugned endorsement dated 31.07.2024 at Annexure-J issued by the first respondent-Deputy Director of Land Records. The appeal filed by the petitioners is restored on the file of the first respondent, with a direction to the first respondent to issue notice to the respondents therein and proceed to consider the appeal in accordance with law.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL CT: JL