[2026:RJ-JP:5232] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 189/2026 1. Aalfiya Bano D/o-Mohd. Irfan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o- Village-Pilwa Nadi, Tehsil-Malarna- Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur,(Raj.) 2. Mohd. Ikramuddin Khan S/o-Sh. Imamuddin Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village-Pilwa Nadi, Tehsil Malarna Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur-Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur-Raj. 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station-Malarna Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station -Soorwal, District-Sawai Madhopur. 5. Mohd. Irfan, S/o-Sattar, R/o-Village-Soorwal, P.s.- Soorwal, District-Sawai Madhopur,(Raj.) 6. Sufiya, W/o-Late. Sh. Sattar, R/o-Village-Soorwal, P.s.- Soorwal, District-Sawai Madhopur,(Raj.) 7. Imamuddin S/o-Shamsuddin, R/o- Village-Pilwa Nadi, Tehsil-Malarna- Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur-Raj. 8. Atisha Bano W/o-Shamsuddin, R/o- Village-Pilwa Nadi, Tehsil-Malarna- Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur-Raj. 9. Naimuddin S/o-Shamsuddin, R/o- Village-Pilwa Nadi, Tehsil-Malarna- Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur-Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/02/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:5232] (2 of 3) [CRLW-189/2026] 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 5 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their “Nikah” and sworn the affidavits which were duly notarized by the Notary Public on 20.01.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos. 5 to 9 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:5232] (3 of 3) [CRLW-189/2026] 9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu /169