$~12 to 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010392792026 (12) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 120/2026 & CM APPL. 56572/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010392892026 (13)+ MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 121/2026 & CM APPL. 56627/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010393062026 (14) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 122/2026 & CM APPL. 56658/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010393092026 (15) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 123/2026 & CM APPL. 56660/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010393112026 (16) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 124/2026 & CM APPL. 56663/2026 # CNR No. DLHC010393722026 (17) MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 125/2026 & CM APPL. 56782/2026 DEPUTY DIRECTOR. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel with Mr.Kanishk Maurya, Adv. versus PERCEPT LOGISTICS PVT. LTD .....Respondent SMT. UMA RAI .....Respondent SHRI UPENDRA RAI .....Respondent RACHANA RAI .....Respondent NARENDRA RAI .....Respondent Through: Mr.Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Mr.Arjun Dewan, Mr.Arjun Mukherjee, Mr.Himanshu Kasturi and Mr.Kartik Sharma, Advs. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2026 at 11:02:22 RAHUL SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Abbot, Mr.Ayush Agarwal and Ms.Nehal Karotiya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 25.08.2026 1. These appeals have been filed by the appellant(s), challenging the Order dated 29.05.2026 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at Delhi in the batch of appeals, including FPA- PMLA-2964/DLI/2019, titled Percept Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi, FPA-PMLA- 2962/DLI/2019, titled as Uma Rai v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi, FPA-PMLA-2953/DLI/2019, titled Upendra Rai v. Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi, FPA-PMLA-2965/DLI/2019, titled Rachana Rai v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi, FPA-PMLA-2963/DLI/2019, titled Narendra Rai v. Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi and FPA-PMLA-2989/DLI/2019, titled Rahul Sharma v. Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi. 2. The learned counsels for the respondents, without prejudice to the rights and contentions, submit that they have no objection if the Impugned Order is set aside and the appeals are remanded before the learned Appellate Tribunal for a fresh adjudication. 3. Keeping in view the above concession, these appeals are This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2026 at 11:02:22 allowed and the Impugned Order dated 29.05.2026 is set aside. The pending applications are disposed of. 4. We, however, make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claims of the parties and the appeals shall be decided by the learned Appellate Tribunal remaining uninfluenced by the present order. All the contentions of the parties shall remain open to be adjudicated before the learned Appellate Tribunal afresh. 5. As the appeals are of the year 2019, we request the learned Appellate Tribunal to try and dispose them of within a period of two months from their first listing. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J AUGUST 25, 2026/sg/pb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2026 at 11:02:22