SUBHAM KUMAR PODDAR @ SHUBHAM KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5252/2026 · 2026-06-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16697 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:17362 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5252 of 2026
------ Subham Kumar Poddar @ Shubham Kumar, aged about 24 years, Sex-Male, S/o Ashok Poddar @ Ashok Kumar Poddar, R/o Village- Khumhar Toli, Karra Road, P.O. + P.S.-Khunti, Dist.-Khunti, Jharkhand, Aadhar No.8779 5833 8049.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kr. Rahul, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P
: Ms. Malsi Pathak, AC to P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 16-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 corresponding to GR Case No.184 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111(2)(b) and 308 of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is an infamous PLFI extremist and was apprehended by police when he came to collect extortion and from the possession of the accused persons of the case, fire arms were recovered while from the possession of the petitioner, 01 pistol along with loaded magazine with 05 live cartridges were recovered. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 10.06.2026 in B.A. No.5052 of 2026. It is lastly submitted
that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.03.2026 as is evident from para-01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khunti in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 corresponding to GR Case No.184 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16/06/2026 Abhiraj/