[2026:RJ-JP:5203] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2301/2026 R.K. Construction Company, (Automated Testing Station - Ats) Through Its Proprietor Sandeep Dhaka S/o Ram Kumar, Age-40 Years, R/o- 132, School Ke Pass, Bas Dhakan, Lohsana Chhota, Churu (Raj.) Having Its Registered Office At Nh-52, Rajgarh Road, Khasra No. 1382/1204,vpo Dhadhar, Tehsil And District Churu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport And Road Safety Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Joint Transport Commissioner (Rules), Transport And Road Safety Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Registering Authority (Ats) Transport Department, (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Pareek, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Abhog Purohit, Mr. Satish K. Khandelwal, Mr. Pulkit Pareek, Ms. Nandini Sharma, Ms. Muskan Soni, Mr. Mukesh K. Gunjan, Mr. Babulal Choudhary and Mr. S.L. Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 04/02/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:5203] (2 of 3) [CW-2301/2026] 1. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the application of the petitioner for establishment of Automated Testing Station (in short ‘ATS’), has been rejected as the land proposed for that testing station, is residential land. Learned Senior Advocate further submits that the petitioner has already submitted an explanation before the respondents authorities that he has surrendered that residential land to be used as a way. He further submits that in view of the aforesaid facts, the respondents authorities may be directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner for grant of Preliminary Registration Certificate (for short ‘PRC’) for the ATS. 2. Considered the submissions made by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if the respondents are directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner in change of the facts and circumstances and the deficiency being cured by the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents authorities to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of PRC for ATS after taking into consideration the subsequent developments and so also the fact that the petitioner submitted an application for surrender of the residential land for use as a way to the testing station, within a period of one month from the date of submission of the certified copy of this order. [2026:RJ-JP:5203] (3 of 3) [CW-2301/2026] 5. It is made clear that this order has been passed without issuing notice to the respondents and in case, the respondents feel aggrieved by this order, they may move an application for recalling of this order. 6. Stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /30