Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1669 (AP)

PANKAJ SARAN v. RAVISHANKAR AYYANAR, IPS

CC/1570/2026 · 2026-04-23

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010182162026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1570/2026 Between: 1. PANKAJ SARAN, S/O GURNAM SARAN (LATE), AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO. J-47, 3RD FLOOR, STREET NO. 32, AREA SAKET, NEW DELHI - 110017, ...PETITIONER AND 1. RAVISHANKAR AYYANAR IPS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID)ANDHRA PRADESH CID HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 503. 2. VINEET BRIJLAL, IPS S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, CID, CID HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 503.. 3. ESWARA RAO, IPS S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID),GUNTUR, CID HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 503. 4. SRIDHAR, STATION HOUSE OFFICER CID POLICE STATION, A.P. CID AP DISTRICT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful disobedience of order of this Hon'ble Court passed in WP. No.14587 of 2025, dt. 20-06-2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): The Court made the following: 3 Order:- This Court, vide order dated 20.06.2025, disposed of W.P. No. 14587 of 2025 after recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader that the FIR was registered on 08.11.2024 and that the police are conducting the investigation, and that it would take some time to finalize the charge sheet. Recording the same, the said writ petition was disposed of, leaving it open for the Investigating Officer to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible. Therefore, there is no ground for filing the present contempt case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed, and such closure shall not preclude the petitioner from taking further steps. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.04.2026 PNS