Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 9228 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 9228 of 2026 V.Rajeshwari ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District collector Collectorate Krishangiri -635001. 2. The Sub collector Bagalur Road Hosur-635 109 Krishnagiri District
3. The Tahsildar Taluk office Road shanthi Nagar East Hosur-635 109
4. The Village Administrative officer Thorapalli village Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District
5. Premadevi ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the Natham Patta No.705 in the name of 5th respondent and consequently issue individual patta in the name of the petitioner for the lands situated in an extent of 512.5 sq.ft situated in Old Natham Sy.No.78/2 and sub divided as New Natham Sy.No.78/3 of Kumudepalli village, Thorapalli https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9228 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Agraharam via, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Babu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 to R4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the Natham Patta issued in favour of the fifth respondent and consequently issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on her representation dated 15.04.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2. Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent in this writ petition is dispensed with. 3. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 1 to 4, if the aforesaid representation of the petitioner is considered, on merits and in accordance with https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9228 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 law, after hearing the objections from the fifth respondent and any other party whom the respondents 1 to 4 deem it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents 1 to 4 to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation dated 15.04.2025 seeking for issuance of patta in her name by cancelling the Natham patta issued in favour of the fifth respondent, for the subject property, after hearing the objections from the fifth respondent and any other party whom they deem it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner. No Costs. 17-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To
1. The District collector Krishangiri -635001
2. The Sub collector Bagalur Road Hosur-635 109 Krishnagiri District
3. The Tahsildar shanthi Nagar Easet Hosur-635 109
4. The Village Administrative officer Thorapalli village Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 9228 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 9228 of 2026 17-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis