[2026:RJ-JP:5340] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1648/2017 Smt. Surji Devi W/o Late Shri Ram Gurjar, R/o Village Papda Tehsil Virat Nagar Distt. Jaipur. Mother Of Deceased ----Appellant Versus 1. Shri Bheru Ram S/o Gheesa Gurjar, R/o Post Savera Tevadi Tehsil Virat Nagar, Distt. Jaipur. All Regd. Owner Of Tractor Bearing No. Rj-32-Ra-1708 2. Shri Badri Narayan S/o Gheesa Gurjar, R/o Post Savera Tevadi Tehsil Virat Nagar, Distt. Jaipur. All Regd. Owner Of Tractor Bearing No. Rj-32-Ra-1708 3. Shri Panna Lal S/o Shri Bheru Lal, R/o Post Savera Tevadi Tehsil Virat Nagar, Distt. Jaipur. All Regd. Owner Of Tractor Bearing No. Rj-32-Ra-1708 4. Shri Ram Niwas S/o Shri Badri Narayan, R/o Post Savera Tevadi Tehsil Virat Nagar, Distt. Jaipur. All Regd. Owner Of Tractor Bearing No. Rj-32-Ra-1708 5. United India Insurance Company Limited, Transport Nagar, Jaipur. Insurer Of Tractor No. Rj-32-Ra-1708 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4210/2016 United India Insurance Company Limited, through Regional Manager, Jaipur. ----Appeallant Versus 1. Smt. Surji Devi W/o Late Shri Ram Gurjar (Mother of Deceased), R/o Village Papda Tehsil Virat Nagar Distt. Jaipur. 2. Shri Bheru Ram S/o Gheesa Gurjar, 3. Shri Badri Narayan S/o Gheesa Gurjar, 4. Shri Panna Lal S/o Shri Bheru Lal, 5. Shri Ram Niwas S/o Shri Badri Narayan, Residents of Post Sawera Tewadi, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur (Owner Tractor No. RJ32.RA.1708) ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:5340] (2 of 3) [CMA-1648/2017] For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Bhati, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 05/02/2026 U;k;ky; vk;qDr deZpkjh {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 t;iqj ftyk&f}rh; t;iqj }kjk izdj.k W.C.C.F. No. 325@2010 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 04-04-2016 ls O;fFkr gksdj mijksDr nksuksa vihysa dze'k% nkosnkj rFkk foi{kh&chek dEiuh dh vksj ls is'k dh x;h gSa tks ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fuLrkfjr dh tk jgh gSaA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&chek dEiuh rFkk izR;FkhZ dh cgl lquh x;h] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA e`rd ekejkt dh ekrk nkosnkj lqjthnsoh }kjk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k Dyse ;kfpdk is'k dj fuosnu fd;k fd e`rd ekejkt] foi{kh la[;k&1 HkS:jke ds VªsDVj uEcj vkj-ts-32&vkj-,-&1708 ij gSYij gksdj deZdkj ds :i esa fu;ksftr Fkk] foi{kh dze&1 ds pkyd /keZiky us vpkud o ykijokgh ls mDr VªsDVj dk Fkzslj LVkVZ dj fn;k ftlls e`rd dk vk/kk fgLlk mlds vUnj pyk x;k vkSj ekSds ij gh mldh e`R;q gks x;hA deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e] 1923 ds rgr izfrdj fnyk;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mijksDr okgu foi{kh la[;k&2 ds ;gka chfer gksuk crk;k] ftl ij fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 04-04-2016 ds ek/;e ls dqy 2]90]281@& :i;s izfrdj e; 12 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk nkosnkj dk fuosnu gS fd fnyk;h x;h izfrdj jkf'k vi;kZIr gS] e`rd dh vk; rFkk vk;q ds vuqlkj izfrdj x.kuk ugha dh x;h gS] vr% iqu% x.kuk fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k] tcfd izR;FkhZ&chek [2026:RJ-JP:5340] (3 of 3) [CMA-1648/2017] dEiuh }kjk ;g rdZ fn;k fd ftl izdkj ls ?kVuk ?kfVr gksuk crk;k gS] ml :i esa ?kVuk ?kfVr ugha gqbZ] oLrqr% Fkzslj muds ;gka chfer ugha Fkk] VªsDVj pkyd dh dksbZ ykijokgh Hkh ugha Fkh] vUr esa Dyse ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Sujatha (2019) 11 SCC 514 esa /kkjk 30 deZdkj {kfriwfrZ vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr ;g fof/kd O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd mDr vf/kfu;e ds rgr fu.khZr izfrdj ;kfpdk ds fo:) fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr gksus ij gh vihy iks"k.kh; gS] rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vihy Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gSA ;|fi bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 01-11-2018 dks fuEu 3 fof/k ds lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr gksuk ekuk gS I) Whether the claim petition filed by the respondent-claimant is maintainable in non-compliance of provision of Section 10 of E.C. Act ? II) Whether the deceased be termed as workman under the provision of Section 2 of the Act ? III) Whether the claim is maintainable and claimants are liable to pay compensation in a situation whether decease plied the vehicle in violation of provision of Section 3 of MV Act ? ijUrq nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl o miyC/k lkexzh ds vuqlkj bl ekeys esa fof/k dk dksbZ lkjoku iz'u vUroZfyr ugha gS] orZeku ekeys esa vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls tks vkifRr vkSj vk{ksi fy;s gSa] os rF;ksa o lk{; ls lacaf/kr gSaA vf/kfu;e&1923 dh /kkjk 30 ds izko/kkuksa dks ns[krs gq, lk{; dk iqu% fo'ys"k.k o foospu vuqKs; ugha gS] vr% ek= bl vk/kkj ij ;s vihysa [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSaA mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 04-04-2016 dh iqf"V djrs gq, orZeku nksuksa vihysa [kkfjt dh tkrh gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /11-12