Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16679 (KAR)

SRI Y N ARVIND v. SMT. M NIKITHA

MFA/9608/2025 · 2026-02-10

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9608 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. Y.N.ARVIND, S/O NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NO.31, SATHYAMARGA, SIDDARTHANAGAR LAYOUT, MYSURU. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINAY N., NITHYANAND M. BHAT, SUMANTH M.S. ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT. M. NIKITHA, W/O ARVIND, D/O S. MADEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. LISHAN NANJEGOWDA, S/O ARAVIND Y.N., AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.142, MUDALAMANE, 4TH MAIN, N-BLOCK, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU. NOW R/AT NO.4, 4/A, 3RD BLOCK, 7TH MAIN ROAD, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU. ..RESPONDENTS MFA No.9608/2025 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 47 of the GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, 1890 against the Order passed in G & WC No.43/2023 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, at Mysuru. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections, failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.10.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T by: DS R by: NR C by: STE