Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12299 RSA No. 1896 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1896 OF 2008 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT PRABHAVATHI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D/O JAYANANDA 5TH WARD, DODDABALLAPUR TOWN
2. MR RAVIKUMAR AGED 36 YEARS S/O JAYANANDA
3. ROOPAVATHI D/O JAYANANDA AGED 33 YEARS
4. GEETHAVATHI D/O JAYANANDA AGED 26 YEARS APPELLANTS NO. 2 TO 4 ARE R/AT LAKKANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. UDAY KUMAR P, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S R SREE PRASAD., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI SIDDALINGAPPA AGED 53 YEARS S/O CHANNABASAPPA
R/AT VYASAPET, 5TH WARD DODDABALLAPUR TOWN BANGALORE DISTRICT
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12299 RSA No. 1896 of 2008
2.
SRI V RUDRAMURTHY MAJOR S/O LATE VEERABHADRAPPA C/O KUMSR, D CROSS DODDABALLAPUR TOWN-562101.
3.
SRI S JAGADISH MAJOR S/O K T SIDDAIAH BASAVAPURA VILLAGE, TONDEBHAVI GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK-561208 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T V VIJAYA RAGHAVAN., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & R3)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED DATED.20.03.2008 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) DODDABALLAPUR IN RA.NO.25/2005 CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.07.2005 PASSED BY THE
ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC., DODDABALLAPUR. IN OS.NO.285/1995 AND DECREE THE SUIT BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that in spite of his best efforts, he could not get any instructions from the appellants. Therefore, he is unable to take steps towards respondent No.2.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12299 RSA No. 1896 of 2008
2. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is taken on record.
3. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14