1 2026:CGHC:2589 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9472 of 2025 Vishnu Adile Son Of Late Rameshwar Adile Aged About 36 Years Resident Of Village Karumouha, Chowki Rajgamar, Tahsil Bhaisma, District Korba (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Civil Line Rampur, District Korba (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Harish Chelkar, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Monika Thakur, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 15.01.2026 1. This the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicants who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.695/2025 registered at Police Station – Civil Line Rampur, District Korba (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 296, 115(2), 351(2), 119(2), 326(f) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The prosecution story in short is that, on 03-11-2025 at about 9.30 VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.01.16 12:05:21 +0530 2 PM in the night, the complainant namely Nikhil Kumar Banjare went at shop of Rajkumar Mahilange with his friend namely Dilharan Miri in his motorcycle bearing Registration Number CG-12/BR-3218, at that time the co-accused namely Aditya Prakash Martand and his other companion demanded the money for liquor from the complainant and when the complainant denied to give money, the accused persons have abused filthy language to the complainant and also assaulted him from fist, blow and also from the stone and thereafter the accused persons fired the vehicle of the complainant. 3. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has neither committed nor participated in any alleged offence and has not acted in the manner attributed to him by the prosecution, and therefore the essential ingredients of the alleged offence are not prima facie attracted against him; it is further pertinent to mention that the complainant himself appeared before the learned Court below and raised no objection, which fact is duly recorded in the order sheet; the applicant has been in judicial custody since 07.11.2025 and the trial is likely to take a considerable time therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the present applicant. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application of the present applicant and submitted that the charge sheet has not been filed. She further submits that the present applicant assaulted injured resulting in grievous injuries. Therefore, the present applicant is not entitled to be granted regular bail in this case. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case 3 diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and as per the case diary, the injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Moreover, the applicant has been in custody since 06.11.2025, and the conclusion of the trial may take some more time. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present applicant is entitled to be released on regular bail in this case. 7. Let the Applicant – Vishnu Adile, involved in Crime No.695/2025 registered at Police Station – Civil Line Rampur, District Korba (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 296, 115(2), 351(2), 119(2), 326(f) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court 4 shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav