AMAR NATH SHARMA, S/O LATE SHRI SURAJMAL SHARMA v. COMMISSIONER
CW/2238/2026 · 2026-02-10
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16665 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16665 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6097] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2238/2026 Amar Nath Sharma, S/o Late Shri Surajmal Sharma, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Plot No. 11, Arya Colony-A, Gadhi Thoriyan Road, Beawar, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Commissioner, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Zila Parishad Ajmer, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Jawaja, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
4. Director, Department Of Pension And Pension Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karan Tibrewal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 10/02/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that feeling aggrieved by orders dated 16.06.2015 & 14.09.2015, an Appeal No.2930/2015 was filed before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for short, 'Tribunal'), which came to be decided vide order dated 08.03.2022, whereby the matter was remanded back to the respondents for taking decision afresh in the matter of recovery from the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that although the order dated 08.03.2022 was passed in presence of
[2026:RJ-JP:6097] (2 of 2) [CW-2238/2026] counsel of the respondents, yet the petitioner sent one notice for demand of justice dated 15.03.2022 to the respondents for making compliance of order of the Tribunal and for deciding the matter afresh, yet till this date, nothing has been done by the respondents.
3. In view of the above limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to make compliance of order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Tribunal in Appeal No.2930/2015, if not done so far, within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
4. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed by this Court on merits of this case.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/2