-1-




IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
 CRM-M-8203-2026 Decided on: 09.03.2026

  …...Petitioner
Versus
   …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for 


 




  





 


 
   







 
 


  

****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)


!
 
  




 
"#$

%&
$'$(



   )


 

*+,
&(-
 
$('.$'$/

 
#0 1
#0$1
/0$1
(((
($"0"1
2 0(1
2'

% )
&))
 
0%&1
$'$(
 


  

3
 
4 
!
!
$

!
 
*+,
3
 

$('.$'$/


  

 
 
5 


 
 
'.$'$/
 




  
 
 3

 66 3
 



  
 
, 

0 
 
  1
+



  


  
 

SONIA PURI 2026.03.16 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
  -2-




   


3
  



  


)

 
, 

0 
 
  1

3 
6 
 

7 

4 

5 


3
3
  
 


 

3
 
3 
3 

 
 

 
8

 
 )
 

 
, 

0 
 
  1
)
 




 
3


 
 
 

 


  
+

)



 
  
3
 
3 





3

 

0 663


  1
3




 3
3



3


 

(

9
  


  
 

  
3


 
-/
) 


 )
  


 
 :



 

 

 6 




 



  


3
3

 
 ):

  



;

 





)
 
 
9

  
)

   )






  

)



  
"

& 

 

/

+
 


 

 


 
  



 


 



  6   
3


 
 

 


SONIA PURI 2026.03.16 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
  -3-






 

  



 

   )



  
-

9
  


  
  )
  



   )



  


 
that there are specific allegations against the present petitioner who is alleged to have raised a lalkaara and was allegedly armed with a deadly weapon i.e. kirpan  )




3

 

0 663


  1



 3
The allegations are serious in nature and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to recover the weapon allegedly used in the commission of offence and hence, the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail.
.

<
#

5 

3




 
 



 

  


  
3

 

3 
  )
3 

 
 

 
 )0 1


  6  )


 
  
3
allegedly armed with a deadly weapon i.e. kirpan,



3

 

0 663


  1



 3:



 


 
  



 
  
  


  

= 




3 



  




 
  


 




 

 
> 6)


   )

+
  
,   
)


   



<? 


SONIA PURI 2026.03.16 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
  -4-




 @

 

 
  
)


)
 
 


 
)

 




 )


 
3

36  
)



  )


3
 
  
)





 
2

+
3



 
  


  

  )


)



 
  

)
  
10. Nothing observed herein shall be construed as 
> 


)




)



(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
09.03.2026
Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable: YES/NO
SONIA PURI 2026.03.16 10:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document