APHC010066762026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION Between: 1. BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D NO. 1 SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1 MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. 2. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DI Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, pleased to Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.29/2025 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna District and Pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 533/2026 BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D NO. 1-54, DODDIPATIA, SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND NANDIGAMA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-79/1, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in 5 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3163] THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY BUSANABOINA LAKSHMI PERANTALLU, W/O RAM BABU, HINDU 54, DODDIPATIA, SEETHANNAPALLI VILLAGE, KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER PURNACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, 79/1, GOPAVARAM VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, PRESENTLY ELURU DISTRICT. SURAPANENI VENKATA NAGA MANI, W/O VIJAY KUMAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MARLAPALEM VILLAGE, CHATRAI ...RESPONDENT(S): praying that in the the High Court may be Set aside the docket order dated 05.02.2026 passed in 5 IN E.P.No.01 /2025 IN O.S.NO.59/2018 on the file of the learned court of Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division) At Kaikaluru, Krishna Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 CMR,J C.R.P.No.533 of 2026 may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.1/2025 in O.S.No.59/2018 pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, including but not limited to execution of delivery warrant, police aid, forcible eviction, redelivery of possession or any coercive steps whatsoever, pending the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition and Pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T ARUNACHALAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 CMR,J C.R.P.No.533 of 2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This revision is preferred against the order dated 05.02.2026 passed in E.A.No.29 of 2025 in E.P.No.01 of 2025 in O.S.No.59 of 2018 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaikaluru, granting Police aid for delivery of the E.P. schedule property in execution of the judgment and decree that was passed by the trial Court. The petitioner, being the 2nd judgment debtor, now challenges the said order granting Police aid on the ground that the second appeal preferred by her is pending before this Court. 3. It is not a valid ground to challenge the impugned order. At best, she can obtain an order of stay in the second appeal to stall the execution proceedings. But, she cannot challenge the order granting Police aid by the executing Court by way of this revision when there is no valid ground warranting interference with the impugned order of the executing Court. 4. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 20.02.2026 MDP