Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1666 (GAU)

SMTI NABASMITA SARKAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/2778/2025 · 2026-01-28

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010244292025 2026:GAU-AS:1000 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2778/2025 SMTI NABASMITA SARKAR C/O -KUSHAL SARKAR, R/O- SAIDORIYA, PO-SAIDORIYA, PS- RUPAHI, DIST- NAGAON, PIN-782125 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:TULTUL KURI D/O GOPAL SUTRADHAR ADD- TELIAPATTY HAIBARGAON PO- HAIBAGAON PS- NAGAON ASSAM.-78214 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS P DAS, LEGAL AID COUNSEL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 29.01.2026 1. Heard Ms. P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted vide Charge-sheet No.68/2025 dated 28.02.2025 against Amal Sarkar but not against the petitioner i.e. Nabasmita Sarkar. 3. Further, by order dated 14.02.2025, the main accused namely, Amal Sarkar was granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Nagaon. 4. In view of the above, there remains no apprehension in the mind of the present petitioner regarding arrest in connection in the aforesaid case. 5. Consequently, the present petition become infructuous. 6. The communication of O/C, Rupahihat dated 15.12.2025 be kept as part of the record. 7. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant