1 58.CA-1760-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1760 OF 2026 IN CP/984/2023 SUSHILABAI GOVINDRAO DECEASED VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Thigale Girish Kalidasrao AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. R.R. Tandale … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 7th OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1760/2026 : 1. Contempt Petition No. 984 of 2023 was dismissed for want of prosecution against Respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6, as the said officers could not be served at the addresses mentioned in the title clause of the Contempt Petition. It is stated in the application that the said officers had been transferred and, therefore, could not be served at the addresses furnished in the title clause. Though the Respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6 served with notice, they have not entered appearance to oppose the restoration application. 2. In view of the above, Civil Application is allowed and Contempt Petition No. 984 of 2023 is restored to its original file. ORDER IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.984/2023 : 3. Leave is granted to furnish correct addresses of Respondent 2026:BHC-AUG:47202 2 58.CA-1760-2026.doc Nos. 2, 5 and 6. 4. Issue notice to Respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6, returnable on 23.10.2026. 5. The Applicant is directed to serve Respondent Nos. 2, 5 and 6 by private mode through Speed Post, in addition to regular mode of service and file affidavit of service before the returnable date. ROHIT W. JOSHI JUDGE ₙₐⱼₑₑᵦ...