Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16652 (CAL)

ANINDYA SUNDAR DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/208/2022 · 2026-03-11

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

March 11, 2026 Sl. No.15 Court No.1 s.biswas WPA(P) 208 of 2022 Anindya Sundar Das vs. The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Dilip Kumar Samanta Mr. Debapriya Samanta ... for the petitioner Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, AAG Mr. Swapan Pal ... for the State Mr. Ayan Banerjee Ms. Debasree Dhamali Ms. Debolina Ghosh ... for the respondent no.2 Mr. Niladri Bhattacharjee Ms. Poulami Chattopadhyay ... for the respondent no.4 Per, Sujoy Paul, C.J. 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned counsel. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the report dated 12th November, 2025 filed by respondent no.2 takes care of his grievance and in view of the contents of this report nothing remains to be done in this PIL. 3. The other side has no objection. 4. The PIL is accordingly disposed of. (Sujoy Paul, C.J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2