Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
126
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM-M-5810-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 25.03.2026
Mellissa Phatak
....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and Others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Mr. Varun Aggarwal, , Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG Punjab -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)
1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (old Section 482 Cr.P.C) for issuance of necessary directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to defreeze/unhold the bank account of the petitioner, which was earlier debit freezed/hold by respondent No.3 on the request/instructions of respondent no.2.
2.
Learned State counsel, on instructions and while referring to the status report, submits that as per paragraph No. 11 thereof, a request letter has already been sent to respondent No. 3 for defreezing the bank account of the petitioner, which had been erroneously frozen by Inspector Amar Singh.
3.
In view of the statement made by learned State counsel and the fact that necessary directions for defreezing the bank account have already been issued by respondent No. 2 to respondent No. 3, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.
TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.25 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-5810-2026 (O&M)
-2-
4.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 5.
March 25, 2026
(MANDEEP PANNU) tripti
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking
Whether reportable
: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.25 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document