- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11454 RFA No. 624 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 624 OF 2014 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI DR M PARTHASARATHY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE T MUNISWAMY RESIDING AT NO. 382 SRICHAKRA NILAYA I FLOOR, 6TH CROSS RMV II STAGE, II BLOCK BANGALORE-560094 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H N SHASHIDHAR.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI B A JANARDAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE T S ANANTHAMURTHY RESIDING AT NO. 7644 WHITE HALL, CIRCLE, EAST WESTCHESTER OHIO-45069, USA REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI SATCHIDANANDA S/O LATE T S ANANTHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 406-A 2ND "A" CROSS, 3RD BLOCK Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11454 RFA No. 624 of 2014 KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560094 2. M/S GREENS AGRI GENETICS PVT LTD HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 325/1 14TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS RMV EXTENSION, SADASHIVANAGARA BANGALORE-560080 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR B RAMESH GOWDA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KUMAR M N FOR R1.,ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.1.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.7835/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION, ARREARS OF RENT, DAMAGES, FUTURE CONSUMPTION CHARGES AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and has not turned up even after the matter is listed under the caption for 'dismissal'. On the previous adjournment, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 was present and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11454 RFA No. 624 of 2014 he stated that he filed suit for injunction, and that was allowed, and now he is in possession of the property and also received arrears of the amount. As such, the learned counsel for the appellant has no interest in pursuing the litigation and he has not turned up even after listing the matter under the caption for 'dismissal'. Therefore, this Court finds it reasonable to dismiss the appeal for non- prosecution. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53