APHC010068602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 75/2025 Between: 1. SAMMETA RUPA URIAMMA @ PULUGU RUPA URIAMMA,, W/O. KIRAN KUMAR REDDY, AGED 29, D/O. PULUGU SUBBA REDDY, R/O. DOOR NO. 7-11, PEDDAPULUGUVARIPALEM, GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, KANAPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SAMMETA KIRAN KUMAR REDDY, S/o. Dharma Reddy, Aged 36, Occ. working in Armed Forces, R/o. Door No. 1- 25/1, Nayeebrahmin Colony, Cherukupalli Post and Mandal, Guntur. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersThe present appeal is filed against the Order dated 01.11.2024 passed in H.M.O.P.NO- 19 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Bapatla, for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, 2 the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay the operation of the Order and Decree dated 01.11.2024 passed in H.M.O.P. No. 19 of 2019 by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bapatia, pending disposal of the appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. RAJESH KONDURI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The respondent/husband filed H.M.O.P.No.19 of 2019, seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The same was allowed by the Principal Civil Judge(Senior Division), Bapatla, on 01.11.2024. 2. Challenging the same, the wife/appellant has filed the present C.M.A. 3. The parties were referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. 4. The report dated 15.10.2025 has been received. The matter has been settled. 3 5. The appellant, namely, Ms.Sammeta Rupa Urlamma @ Pulugu Rupa Urlamma and the respondent, namely, Sammeta Kiran Kumar Reddy along with their respective counsels are present. 6. Both the parties as well as their respective counsels submit that the matter has been settled as per the terms of the settlement filed along with the report of the mediator. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has come prepared for payment of the amount under the settlement and demand draft bearing No.214415 dated 23.12.2025 for Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs only) drawn on State Bank of India in favour of the appellant as also the F.D.R. in the name of son by name Sammeta Mokshendra Reddy for an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) drawn on State Bank of India are ready. 8. The aforesaid demand draft and F.D.R have been handed over to the 1st appellant in Court. The 2nd appellant is the minor son, represented by mother, the 1st appellant. 9. In view thereof, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the lis does not survive any more for adjudication. 10. Accordingly, in terms of the settlement, the C.M.A. is closed. 4 11. The other terms of the settlement shall be complied by the respective parties timely and before the appropriate forum. 12. The settlement shall form part of the order passed in this appeal. There shall be no order as to costs in the appeal. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 08.01.2026 Pab 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 75/2025 DATE: 08.01.2026 Pab