Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14970 WP No. 7671 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 7671 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
PURAVANKARA LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.130/1, ULSOOR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 042 REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR LEGAL EXECUTIVE SHREYA VK JAIN. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING DR.AMBEKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COLLECTOR'S OFFICE BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14970 WP No. 7671 of 2026
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110.
4.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DEVANAHALLI SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
5.
THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
6.
SRI. MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O SRI. CHIKKANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT UGANAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN CASE NO.BHUTHAMSA.APPEAL/253/2022-23 DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2024, IN RESPECT OF SURVEY NO. 39 OF UGANAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK (ANNEXURE A) INSOFAR HAS PETITIONER CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14970 WP No. 7671 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Notice to respondent No.6 is not necessary for the following reasons:
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection that the order impugned is passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records under Section 49(A) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act') and any person aggrieved of such an
order is required to file a second appeal under Section 50 of the Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner however seeks to contend that though the petitioner is shown as respondent No.4 in the proceedings before the Deputy Director, nevertheless a wrong address is shown and the petitioner was not served with a notice and the Deputy Director has set aside the phodi proceedings that has
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14970 WP No. 7671 of 2026 happened in the year 2017 without condoning the delay. Therefore, the learned counsel submits that the objection raised by the learned Additional Government Advocate should not be sustained and this Court is not barred from entertaining the writ petition even on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, since the petitioner is arrayed as respondent No.4 in the proceedings before the Deputy Director, the petitioner cannot contend that the order impugned has been passed without notice to the petitioner. The appellate authority is competent to consider such contentions that would be raised by the petitioner by calling for the records.
5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. Ordered accordingly.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14970 WP No. 7671 of 2026 Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18