Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16640 (AP)

B. PRATAP REDDY v. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, IAS

CC/848/2023 · 2026-03-10

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010065082023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 848/2023 Between: 1. B. PRATAP REDDY, S/O. VENKATRAMEE REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. CHINIGEPALLI, CHINNAGATTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PR AND RD BLOCK NO. 5, A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. K VENKATRAMA REDDY, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. HANUMAN NAIK, THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. RAJAJI, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. M MOHAN REDDY, THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHINNAGATTIGALU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully and intentionally disobeying the order dated 06.01.2023 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2023 in W.P.No.818 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. T BALASWAMI 2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 3. G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.01.2023 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2023 in W.P.No.818 of 2023. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the contemnors submits that subsequently after passing of interim orders, upon the submissions of the respondents that there is no proposal for laying CC Road, this Court had closed the main writ petition No.818 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :11.03.2026 RSD 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH C.C. No.848 of 2023 Date :11.03.2026 RSD