KASIM @ PAV S/O SHRI MEHMUD HASAN @ MUNNA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2233/2026 · 2026-03-23
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1664 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2233/2026 Kasim @ Pav S/o Shri Mehmud Hasan @ Munna, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kanak Bag Colony, Manpur Sadwa, Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur North, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 23/03/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 18/2026 registered at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, District Jaipur (North) for the offence(s) under Section 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Section Section 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 dismissed the bail application before it.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is a young person, aged about 28 years. It is further submitted that approximately 25.50 gms of smack has been recovered qua the applicant, which is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity of 250 gms. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. [2026:RJ-JP:12220] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2233/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that there are as many as ten criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the applicant and if the applicant is enlarged on bail he will be a threat to the society. The criminal antecedents of the accused-applicant are reproduced herein below: dz la- Eqkdnek uacj /kkjk Iqfyl Fkkuk urhtk
01. 362/18 379 Hkk-n-la- Xkyrk xsV pkyku 02 363/19 379 Hkk-n-la- Xkyrk xsV pkyku 03 248/21 8@21]8@29 ,uMhih,l ,DV vkesj Pkyku 04 388/21 4@25 vkElZ ,DV Xkyrk xsV pkyku 05 25/22 365 Hkk-n-la- Xkyrk xsV pkyku 06 27/22 8@21]8@29 ,uMhih,l ,DV Xkyrk xsV pkyku 07 129/22 8@21 ,uMhih,l ,DV Xkyrk xsV pkyku 08 369/23 427]336 Hkk-n-la- Tk;flagiqjk [kksj pkyku 09 350/23 143]323]341]392 Hkk-n-la- Xkyrk xsV TkSj rQ~rhl 10 268/24 8@21 ,uMhih,l ,DV Tk;flagiqjk [kksj pkyku
4.
Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the applicant is a young person, aged about 28 years; that recovery of 25.50 gms of smack has been recovered, which is less than the prescribed commercial quantity; that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case and taking note of the fact that there are as many as ten criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the applicant is stated to be a threat to the society if he is enlarged on bail and keeping in mind the sacrosanct objective of Indian criminal reformative system and balancing the equity between right of the liberty, strong criminal antecedents
[2026:RJ-JP:12220] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2233/2026] and young age of applicant, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail with following conditions: 4.1 That the applicant will go for his employment/work and reside 250 kms away from the place of his current residence for a period of three months as the applicant is in habit of committing the offence in the vicinity of Jaipur. 4.2 That on every 5th of successive month, applicant will mark attendance before the jurisdictional police station. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Kasim @ Pav S/o Shri Mehmud Hasan @ Munna shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J RINCHU /79