Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12552 WP No. 21150 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 21150 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMANJINAPPA S/O LATE KEMPANNA AND AKKAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT POOJANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 110 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEKDAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12552 WP No. 21150 of 2023
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, 2ND FLOOR, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGLAURU - 560 063.
5.
SRI. PILLAPPA S/O LATE HULIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT HUNASAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562 157. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - QUASH THE
ORDER DT 01/09/2023 MADE IN REVISION PETITION NO.
150/2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE R-2 IN SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 23/04/2021 PASSED BY THE R-3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN R.A (BNA) 170/2016-17.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12552 WP No. 21150 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 13.02.2026, the following order was passed:
"Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. If the office objections are not complied with, list this matter for dismissal on 27.02.2026."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8