Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16634 (RAJ)

RAMESH CHAND S/O GIRDHARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1845/2026 · 2026-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4565] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1845/2026 1. Ramesh Chand S/o Girdhari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Khipkapura, Police Station Suroth, District Karauli, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaucity). 2. Pinkesh Kumar @ Pinky S/o Girdhari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Khipkapura, Police Station Suroth, District Karauli, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaucity). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P. Mr. Anil Kumar Shukla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No. 434/2025 registered at Police Station Surauth, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 74 303(2), 324(4), 324(5), 333, 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and also learned counsel for the complainant and perused the case diary. [2026:RJ-JP:4565] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1845/2026] 4. As per the contents of the F.I.R. there are general allegations against the accused-petitioners of throwing stones but no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since 09.01.2026. On perusal of the case diary it is revealed that injury sustained by the complainant party are found to be simple in nature. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused-petitioners and so also the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the accused-petitioners and they are in custody since 09.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /177